Individual skill

wacv-supplementary

Use when organizing WACV supplementary material, covering what belongs in the anonymized supplement versus the 8-page body, packaging qualitative videos and extra results without breaking double-blind, keeping the supplement consistent with the paper across the two-round revision, and honoring WACV's no-author-identifying-links rule.

WACV-Skills/skills/wacv-supplementary/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# WACV Supplementary

Use this to decide what leaves the 8-page body for the supplement and how to package it
without leaking identity. WACV's applications work is often visual and systems-heavy, so the
supplement carries videos and protocol detail — and the two-round model means it must stay
consistent with the paper across a revision. Facts are the WACV 2026/2027 cycles as read on
2026-07-09.

## Body vs supplement split

The **8-page body including figures and tables** holds the argument; the supplement holds
the evidence a reviewer consults to verify it. Keep the body self-sufficient — a reviewer
must be able to follow the contribution without opening the supplement — and push depth down:
Back to top