Menu

Individual skill

dac-reproducibility

0upvotes

Use when building the reproducibility story for an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript, covering pinned EDA benchmark suites and versions (ISPD, EPFL, ISCAS/ITC, TAU, CircuitNet), open-source flow provenance (OpenROAD, ABC, Yosys), PDK/library and tool-version disclosure, seed/variance reporting for stochastic and ML flows, and the anonymized-then-public repository path — absent a formal DAC artifact-badging track.

DAC-Skills/skills/dac-reproducibility/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,410
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# DAC Reproducibility

Build the reproducibility story into the evaluation, not onto it. DAC does **not** run a formal,
badge-issuing artifact-evaluation track for research manuscripts (**待核实** per cycle), so
reproducibility at DAC is not a review checkbox — it is what makes your QoR numbers *credible* to a
skeptical EDA reviewer and *usable* by the community that cites you. The currency is **pinned
benchmarks, disclosed tool versions, and re-runnable flows**.

## The EDA reproducibility floor

- **Pin the benchmark suite and version.** Name the exact suite (ISPD 2005/2015 contests, the EPFL
  combinational suite, ISCAS'85/'89, ITC'99, a TAU contest set, CircuitNet/OpenABC-D) and the
  specific release. "Standard benchmarks" without a version is not reproducible.
- **Disclose the flow and tool versions.** State the EDA tools and versions used — open (OpenROAD,
Back to top