Individual skill
interspeech-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the experimental evidence for an INTERSPEECH paper — task-correct metrics (WER/CER, MOS/CMOS, EER/minDCF, PESQ/STOI), baselines reviewers accept, significance testing over utterances and seeds, condition coverage across speakers/noise/languages, and data hygiene for speech corpora.
INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,544 bytes
Read excerpt
# INTERSPEECH Experiments
"Not convincing" is the standard Interspeech rejection, and it almost always means
the experimental design — not the idea — failed. Speech evaluation has decades of
conventions per task; an experiment section that ignores them is illegible to the
reviewer pool regardless of how good the numbers are.
## Metric-task law
| Task family | Primary metrics | Convention notes |
|---|---|---|
| ASR | WER / CER | normalization + scorer disclosed; CER for unsegmented scripts |
| TTS / VC | MOS, CMOS (+ objective proxies) | panel protocol reported; CMOS for close systems |
| Speaker verification | EER, minDCF | official trial lists; DCF prior/costs stated |