Individual skill
atc-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) systems paper — matching evidence to the claim with real testbeds, fair baselines, end-to-end plus microbenchmark results, tail-latency and variance reporting, workload realism, and honest cost accounting.
ATC-Skills/skills/atc-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- testing Derived category
- testing-browser Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,255 bytes
Read excerpt
# ATC Experiments
Match the evidence to the claim. ATC is the systems community's **implementation-and-measurement**
venue: reviewers read for measured behavior on a real system, not asymptotics or accuracy on a
dataset. In round two, 3-4 reviewers close to your subarea will open the artifact and probe whether
the numbers are end-to-end, fair, and honest about cost. Design the evaluation so their first three
objections are already answered.
## Match evidence to claim shape
| If your claim is... | The evidence ATC expects |
|---|---|
| "Faster / lower latency" | End-to-end latency **including tails (p99/p999)** and throughput at a **matched** operating point, on a described testbed |
| "Lower overhead / cheaper" | The resource cost (CPU, memory, writes, energy) measured, at matched function — not just the headline win |