Menu

Individual skill

jue-rebuttal

0upvotes

Use when a Journal of Urban Economics (JUE) decision letter (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) needs a response-letter strategy and a revision plan. Turns referee reports into a point-by-point response and routes the analytical work back through the pack; it does not run the new analysis itself.

Journal-of-Urban-Economics-Skills/skills/jue-rebuttal/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Rebuttal Strategy (jue-rebuttal)

## When to trigger

- A JUE R&R or major-revision letter arrived and you need a response plan
- Referees raised spatial objections (sorting, spillover, scale, spatial SEs) you must now answer with evidence
- Referees disagree with each other or with the editor and you must triage
- You are deciding which requests to satisfy, which to push back on, and which to defer
- A reject-and-resubmit invites a re-engineered design and you must scope it

## Read the editor first, then the referees

The editor's letter, not the longest referee report, sets the bar. JUE editors (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准) signal which concerns are **binding** for acceptance and which are advisory. Build the plan around the binding spatial concerns; do not exhaust effort on a referee's cosmetic asks while the editor's identification worry goes half-answered.
Back to top