Individual skill

colt-writing-style

Use when revising a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) paper for theorem-first exposition — formal setup before results, informal-then-formal theorem statements, proof overviews that sell the technique, quantifier and constant hygiene, and fitting the argument's spine into 12 PMLR-formatted pages.

COLT-Skills/skills/colt-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# COLT Writing Style

Use this when revising prose and mathematics for COLT. The style target is a paper a
learning theorist can referee efficiently: the model is unambiguous by page 3, the
main theorem is quotable in one breath, and the proof overview convinces the reader
the technique is new before the appendix is opened.

## The COLT first-pages arc

1. **Problem in the field's own vocabulary** — regret, sample complexity, minimax
   risk, oracle complexity, mistake bound — within the first paragraphs.
2. **What was known**: the best prior upper and lower bounds, with citations, ideally
   as an inline mini-table when three or more results interact.
3. **The new result, informally**: "we close this gap up to log factors" /
Back to top