Individual skill
jeem-literature-positioning
Use when the contribution of a Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (JEEM) manuscript relative to the environmental-economics frontier and its sibling journals is fuzzy or undersold. Stakes the claim against the field; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Journal-of-Environmental-Economics-and-Management-Skills/skills/jeem-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 8,871 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature Positioning (jeem-literature-positioning)
## When to trigger
- A referee or coauthor says "we already know this" or "how is this different from [field paper]?"
- The intro reviews the environmental literature but never states what is *new* about this paper
- The paper could be read as a near-replication of a known hedonic / DiD / valuation study
- You must show the marginal contribution to environmental economics, not to applied micro in general
## What "contribution" means at JEEM
JEEM referees are environmental and resource economists; they read the literature you are extending and they reward a contribution that is **environmental-economic**, not merely methodological or empirical-on-a-green-dataset. A clean DiD on a new policy is not automatically a contribution — the question is whether it moves the field's understanding of an **externality, a regulatory instrument, a resource margin, or a nonmarket value**. State the contribution as one of these:
- **A policy parameter the field needs** — a new estimate of a marginal damage, an abatement-cost elasticity, a permit-market pass-through, a compliance cost, a resource-rent dissipation.