Individual skill
uai-author-response
Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.
UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,401
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,356 bytes
Read excerpt
# UAI Author Response
Use this once reviews land. In the 2026 cycle the author response and discussion period
ran April 23 – May 2, and the reviewers' discussion with area chairs followed on
May 2 – 8 — meaning your reply is debated in a room you have already left. Write for
that second room. Reconfirm the current cycle's response mechanics on the UAI pages and
in the OpenReview forum instructions before drafting; formats change year to year.
## The four axes, and what each objection is really about
UAI's posted review criteria are technical correctness, novelty, convincing backing of
claims, and clarity of writing. Map every reviewer point onto one axis before answering;
a reply that answers the wrong axis reads as evasion.