Individual skill

uai-author-response

Use when drafting UAI author responses during the OpenReview rebuttal window, turning reviewer objections about technical correctness, novelty, evidential backing, or clarity into anonymous, evidence-anchored replies that survive the reviewer-and-area-chair discussion phase that follows immediately after authors go quiet.

UAI-Skills/skills/uai-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,401
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# UAI Author Response

Use this once reviews land. In the 2026 cycle the author response and discussion period
ran April 23 – May 2, and the reviewers' discussion with area chairs followed on
May 2 – 8 — meaning your reply is debated in a room you have already left. Write for
that second room. Reconfirm the current cycle's response mechanics on the UAI pages and
in the OpenReview forum instructions before drafting; formats change year to year.

## The four axes, and what each objection is really about

UAI's posted review criteria are technical correctness, novelty, convincing backing of
claims, and clarity of writing. Map every reviewer point onto one axis before answering;
a reply that answers the wrong axis reads as evasion.
Back to top