Individual skill

jbes-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES) methods paper against prior econometric and statistical methods. Stakes what is new relative to the existing toolkit; it does not write a standalone literature survey.

Journal-of-Business-and-Economic-Statistics-Skills/skills/jbes-literature-positioning/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Literature Positioning (jbes-literature-positioning)

## When to trigger

- A referee will ask "how is this different from method X already in the literature?"
- The contribution relative to the closest existing estimator/test/algorithm is fuzzy
- You are unsure whether your improvement is incremental or genuinely new
- You need to map your method onto the right strand (time series, panel, GMM, ML, Bayesian, etc.)

## Why positioning is the methods-paper crux at JBES

JBES referees are method experts: they judge a paper first by **what it adds to the existing toolkit**. Because the journal explicitly welcomes **adaptation of methods from machine learning and data science** alongside classical econometrics, your closest competitors may live in **two literatures at once** — the statistics/ML method you adapt *and* the econometric problem you apply it to. Position against **both**. The contribution must be stated as a delta against named prior methods, not as a freestanding survey: which assumptions you relax, which rates you improve, which computational barrier you remove, or which empirical setting prior methods cannot handle.

## Positioning protocol
Back to top