Individual skill
interspeech-reproducibility
Use when hardening the reproducibility of an INTERSPEECH paper — pinning corpus versions and official splits, publishing text-normalization and scoring rules that WER/EER silently depend on, documenting MOS listening-test protocols, reporting seeds and variance within 4 pages, and making toolkit recipes rerunnable.
INTERSPEECH-Skills/skills/interspeech-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,244 bytes
Read excerpt
# INTERSPEECH Reproducibility
Speech results decay through the *measurement*, not just the model. Two labs with
identical checkpoints can report WERs a point apart because their text
normalization differs, and two identical TTS systems can score half a MOS point
apart under different listening panels. Interspeech reviewers know this, and the
4-page format means reproducibility is asserted through precise, compressed
disclosure — there is no appendix to hide vagueness in.
## The five decay channels
| Channel | How results drift | Pin it by |
|---|---|---|
| Corpus version & splits | "test" ≠ official test; filtered utterances | Name corpus version + official partition; list any filtering rule |