Individual skill
webconf-review-process
Use when reasoning about how the Web Conference (WWW) evaluates papers — track-scoped double-blind review, the rebuttal-to-notification pipeline, how the ten research tracks shape reviewer expectations, main versus companion proceedings outcomes, and what authors can and cannot influence at each stage.
The-Web-Conference-Skills/skills/webconf-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,937 bytes
Read excerpt
# Web Conference Review Process
The Web Conference reviews papers **inside topical tracks**, and that single design
choice explains most of what authors experience: who reviews the paper, what
evidence bar applies, and why two similar papers can meet very different fates in
the same year. This skill models the pipeline as verified for the 2026 edition;
per-track reviewer counts, scoring scales, and meta-review mechanics were not
published in verifiable sources and are marked 待核实 where they matter.
## Pipeline with 2026 anchors
| Stage | 2026 date | Author-controllable? |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract registration | Sep 30, 2025 | Fully — track, title, final author list |