Individual skill

jle-robustness

Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) manuscript's headline estimate must be shown to survive specification, sample, jurisdiction, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the robustness suite a law-and-economics referee expects; it does not establish the primary identification (jle-identification) or format the exhibits (jle-tables-figures).

Journal-of-Law-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jle-robustness/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Robustness Suite (jle-robustness)

## When to trigger

- The main estimate of a legal/regulatory effect is in hand and you must show it is not an artifact of one specification
- A referee asks "is this robust to alternative controls / sample / which jurisdictions / how you date the rule?"
- The result depends on a bandwidth, a clustering choice, a treatment date, or a sample of included jurisdictions that could be questioned
- You suspect specification-search concerns and want to pre-empt them

## The JLE robustness bar

JLE referees — economists who know the institution — probe whether the estimated effect of the rule is **stable, honestly inferred, and not the product of researcher degrees of freedom**, with special attention to **legal-design choices**: how you dated the rule, which jurisdictions you treated as controls, whether enforcement was uniform. Robustness here is not a wall of regressions; it is a **targeted set of checks each tied to a specific threat to the legal identification**. Map every plausible objection to the one check that answers it, and show the point estimate barely moves.

| Threat to the result | The check that answers it |
Back to top