Individual skill

psychrev-workflow

Use when deciding which psychrev-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a theory or formal-model manuscript from problem framing through masked-review revision for a Psychological Review submission. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-workflow/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Psychological Review Theory Workflow (psychrev-workflow)

## Overview

This is the router. It does not replace any specialized skill — it tells you **which
psychrev-* skill to use at the current stage** of a Psychological Review manuscript.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as Psychological
Review — the American Psychological Association's flagship for **theoretical
contributions** in scientific psychology. Per its scope it "publishes articles that make
important theoretical contributions to any area of scientific psychology, including
systematic evaluation of alternative theories"; papers "mainly focused on surveys of the
literature, problems of method and design, or reports of empirical findings are not
appropriate" (apa.org/pubs/journals/rev, 检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). The deliverable is a
Back to top