Individual skill
naacl-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the experimental program of a NAACL submission — matching evidence to language-coverage claims, keeping cross-lingual comparisons budget-fair, testing on natively authored rather than translated data where the claim requires it, and reporting variance that survives reviewer probing.
NAACL-Skills/skills/naacl-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- data Derived category
- testing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,014 bytes
Read excerpt
# NAACL Experiments
Design experiments backwards from the sentence you want the meta-review to
contain. For NAACL-bound work that sentence almost always has a language
scope in it, so the experimental program's first duty is to make the scope
claim measurable — and its second duty is to make every comparison fair
enough that no single reviewer probe collapses it.
## Match the design to the coverage claim
| Claim you want to make | Minimum design that supports it | Design that fakes it |
|---|---|---|
| "Works for language X" | Natively authored X test data, native-speaker error review | Machine-translated English benchmark relabeled as X |
| "Works across the Americas' languages" | Typologically spread sample (e.g., analytic + agglutinative + polysynthetic) | Three Romance languages standing in for a continent |