Individual skill
icalp-supplementary
Use when splitting an ICALP (EATCS) theory paper between the 15-page main body and the clearly labelled appendix / full version — deciding what a referee must see in the body versus what may be deferred, ensuring every deferred proof is actually present and findable, and keeping the split consistent with lightweight double-blind review.
ICALP-Skills/skills/icalp-supplementary/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,901 bytes
Read excerpt
# ICALP Supplementary (the body / appendix / full-version split)
ICALP gives you a **15-page body** (excluding references and a clearly labelled appendix) plus an
appendix that may hold omitted proofs or a **full version**, read **at the program committee's
discretion**. The whole game is deciding **what goes where**: the body must let a referee *judge and
follow* the paper; the appendix must let them *verify* it. Getting this split wrong — either cramming
proofs into the body or hiding the substance in an unread appendix — is a common, avoidable weakness.
## The governing principle
> The body earns the referee's belief; the appendix earns their verification.
- The **body** contains the model, the theorem statements, the main ideas, the key lemmas, and enough
of the central proof that a referee can see **why it is true** and **that it is nontrivial**.