Individual skill

eacl-author-response

Use when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient reviews, and decide respond-now versus revise-for-a-later-venue given EACL's single cycle.

EACL-Skills/skills/eacl-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD: Yes
Scanner rules are current: No
Repository scan complete: No
Skill scan complete: Yes
Observed behavior: Not checked yet
Last checked: Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings): 1,411
Repository last updated: Sep 27, 2026
License: MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

academic-writing Repository topic
agent-skills Repository topic
journal Repository topic
academic-research Repository topic
ai-agents Repository topic
anthropic Repository topic
awesome-list Repository topic
claude Repository topic
claude-code Repository topic
economics Repository topic
engineering Derived category

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files

SKILL.mdcore · 4,159 bytes

Read excerpt


# EACL Author Response

Use this to work the ARR rebuttal window for a paper aimed at EACL. In ARR the response is
addressed to reviewers **and** to the **action editor** who will synthesize a meta-review;
that meta-review, not any single score, is what EACL's area chairs read at commitment. Reopen
the current ARR author guidelines before drafting.

## Read the room first

- Identify the **action editor's lens**: the meta-review is where reviews get weighed, so a
  response that moves the action editor matters more than one that merely satisfies the harshest
  reviewer.
- Separate **blocking objections** (a claim reviewers think is unsupported, a missing baseline,
  a reproducibility gap) from **preference comments** (a different framing, an extra dataset a