Individual skill

asplos-topic-selection

Use when deciding whether a project belongs at ASPLOS or at a single-community venue — applying the cross-layer deletion test, matching against ASPLOS's architecture/PL/OS intersection identity, routing to ISCA/MICRO/HPCA, PLDI/POPL, SOSP/OSDI/EuroSys, SC, or MLSys instead, and choosing between the April and September deadlines.

ASPLOS-Skills/skills/asplos-topic-selection/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,410
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ASPLOS Topic Selection

ASPLOS's self-description is unusually operational: it seeks work that improves the
core disciplines — operating systems, programming languages, computer architecture —
**and their intersection**, and its 2027 rapid-review round explicitly prioritizes
submissions at that intersection (CFP, checked 2026-07-08). Venue fit is therefore
not a prestige question here; it is a screening variable. A technically strong paper
that lives cleanly inside one community can be filtered in the first round not
because it is bad but because a single-community venue owns its reviewers.

## The deletion test

Ask, for each layer the paper touches: *if this layer's content were deleted, would
a publishable paper remain?*
Back to top