Individual skill

sosp-supplementary

Use when deciding what belongs in a SOSP supplementary document versus the 12-page paper, packaging proofs, extended analyses, and methodological detail as a separate anonymized upload, and keeping review-critical evidence out of material reviewers are not obligated to read.

SOSP-Skills/skills/sosp-supplementary/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# SOSP Supplementary Material

Use this while splitting content between the SOSP paper and its optional supplement.
The CFP (2026 cycle, checked 2026-07-08 via `sigops.org/s/conferences/sosp/2026/cfp.html`
and the `sosp26.hotcrp.com` submission form) allows supplementary material as a
**separate document** uploaded alongside the anonymized PDF. Its charter is narrow:
content that supports the paper but is **not critical to evaluating it** — formal
proofs, extra data analyses, methodological detail. Reviewers may open it; nothing
obligates them to.

## The governing asymmetry

The paper must stand alone inside its 12 pages of technical content. The supplement
can only *deepen* an argument the paper already completes — it cannot *carry* one.
Back to top