Individual skill
jpsp-review-process
Use to understand how a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) manuscript is judged — per-section editors, masked review, the theoretical-innovation gate, central vs. peripheral limitations, and decision categories. Sets expectations; it does not predict any specific editor's or reviewer's verdict.
Journal-of-Personality-and-Social-Psychology-Skills/skills/jpsp-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,008 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process — Per Section (jpsp-review-process)
JPSP is reviewed **inside one of three independently edited sections**, by an editor and reviewers
who are **mutually masked** to the authors. Knowing how *your* section frames decisions helps you
anticipate what reviewers will ask. The IRGP section has published an unusually explicit review model
(below); ASC and PPID share the masked, theory-first culture but set their own specifics (verify).
## When to trigger
- Anticipating how the section will evaluate the paper before submitting
- Interpreting a decision letter's framing (innovation, central vs. peripheral limitations)
- Deciding whether a prospective design should be a Registered Report (Stage 1)
## How the section judges a paper