Menu

Individual skill

percom-review-process

0upvotes

Use when reasoning about how an IEEE PerCom research submission is evaluated, covering double-blind review, the three-TPC-member model, the early-rejection stage, the single-round bounded rebuttal gated by a "weak accept," the accept/reject decision, and how PerCom's process differs from ACM UbiComp/IMWUT's journal revise cycle.

PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PerCom Review Process

Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. PerCom's process is a **single annual
review round with a bounded rebuttal and an early-rejection gate** — not a journal-style
revise-and-resubmit, and not a multi-deadline conference. The most consequential mental shift for
authors arriving from ACM UbiComp/IMWUT is that there is **no revise cycle**: the paper is judged
on what it submitted, with one bounded chance to answer questions.

## Process model

- Submission and review run on **HotCRP** with **double-blind** review: authors anonymize in good
  faith and cite their own prior work in the third person.
- Each reviewed paper is read by **three** TPC members, who weigh the significance of the
  pervasive-computing contribution, soundness of the method, quality and honesty of the evaluation
Back to top