Individual skill
jmgmt-data-analysis
Use when estimation and results are the bottleneck for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — SEM/CFA, HLM/multilevel, regression and interactions, mediation/moderation, and meta-analytic estimation with artifact corrections. Runs and validates the analysis; it does not design the study (jmgmt-methods) or frame the contribution (jmgmt-contribution-framing).
Journal-of-Management-Skills/skills/jmgmt-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,410
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- design Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 8,288 bytes
Read excerpt
# Data Analysis (jmgmt-data-analysis)
## When to trigger
- The model is fit but a reviewer questions the measurement model or fit indices
- Mediation/moderation is tested in a way a JOM methods reviewer would challenge
- Nested data are being analyzed without modeling the nesting
- A meta-analysis needs the right estimator, corrections, and heterogeneity diagnostics
- Results are reported with significance asterisks and no effect sizes
## The JOM analysis bar
JOM houses some of the field's leading **research-methods** scholars and runs methods reviews, so analysis is read by an unusually demanding audience. The expectation is a **transparent measurement model before the structural model**, **effect sizes and confidence intervals** alongside tests (not p-stars alone), and analysis choices that match the level and design set in `jmgmt-methods`. Report enough that the analysis is reconstructable from the paper and the (anonymized) data transparency table.