Individual skill

icdt-review-process

Use when reasoning about how an ICDT (International Conference on Database Theory) submission is evaluated, covering the two-submission-cycle model, the first-cycle revision (Accept / Revise / Reject) decision, anonymous review since 2024, the cross-cycle resubmission restriction, proof-correctness scrutiny by a database-theory PC, and how ICDT's process differs from PODS and from the co-located EDBT systems track.

ICDT-Skills/skills/icdt-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICDT Review Process

Model the pipeline before interpreting any single review. ICDT's process is built around **two
submission cycles per year** and a **first-cycle revision option**, and the reviewing bar is
**proof correctness**: the referees are database theorists who will check the argument, not just
weigh the idea. The most consequential mental shift for authors arriving from a systems venue is
that a wrong or incomplete proof is not a "revise" — it is often a reject, because the contribution
*is* the theorem.

## Process model

- Submission and review run on **Microsoft CMT** with **anonymous** review (regular track, since
  2024): the PC does not see author identities.
- Each cycle has an **abstract deadline** then a **paper deadline** about a week later; the PC bids
Back to top