Individual skill
revacc-review-process
Use when calibrating expectations for the Review of Accounting Studies (RAST) review cycle — its fast, first-round-decision culture, double-blind process, the RAST Conference path, and when to consider a sibling venue. Sets expectations and strategy; it does not run the submission preflight (revacc-submission) or draft the response letter (revacc-rebuttal).
Review-of-Accounting-Studies-Skills/skills/revacc-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- finance Derived category
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,126 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (revacc-review-process)
## When to trigger
- You have submitted to RAST and want to understand what the timeline and decision will look like
- You received a terse first-round decision and need to interpret it
- You are deciding whether RAST's fast, decisive process fits your paper's stage of polish
- You are weighing the **RAST Conference** path against the regular track
- You are choosing between RAST and a sibling (TAR/JAR/JAE/CAR) on process grounds
## RAST's distinguishing process culture
RAST advertises **prompt turnaround** and — importantly — an explicit tradition of making an **accept/reject decision on the first round for the majority of manuscripts**, rather than running paper after paper through multiple R&R cycles (待核实; 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). This shapes strategy more than any other RAST fact:
