Individual skill

pods-author-response

Use when drafting ACM PODS author responses, covering the short ~48-hour double-anonymous rebuttal that corrects misreadings of proofs and definitions, and — distinctively — the shepherded revision cover letter that maps every required item to a concrete change in the resubmitted paper and survives the shepherd's second read.

PODS-Skills/skills/pods-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PODS Author Response

Use this after PODS reviews are released. PODS has **two distinct speaking turns**, and conflating
them is a common mistake: a short **rebuttal** (about 48 hours, a few thousand characters) right after
reviews, and — if you receive a **revision** decision — a **revision cover letter** accompanying a
resubmitted paper that a **shepherd** re-reads. Both stay double-anonymous: do not reveal authors,
affiliations, or a named system, even to strengthen a point.

## Triage (both turns)

- Answer what affects correctness first: a claimed error in a proof, an unstated assumption, a
  mismatch between an upper and a lower bound, or an out-of-scope objection.
- Distinguish a **misreading** (the reviewer misunderstood a definition or missed an existing appendix
  proof — fixable now, in the rebuttal) from a **real gap** (a step that genuinely needs to be written
Back to top