Individual skill

sosp-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising SOSP prose — leading with a design principle rather than a feature list, building the intro's problem-to-insight arc, budgeting 12 dense two-column pages across design and evaluation, writing figures that argue, and keeping claims inside what the measurements support.

SOSP-Skills/skills/sosp-writing-style/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# SOSP Writing Style

Use this at drafting and revision time for a SOSP paper. The format constants (2026
cycle, checked 2026-07-08 against the official author guidelines): at most 12 pages
of technical content in submission, 10-point font on 12-point leading, a 7 x 9 inch
text block in two columns, references uncounted. Those pages are read first by a
skeptical fast pass and later defended live at a PC meeting — the prose must arm an
advocate, not just inform a reader.

## Lead with the principle, not the artifact

The recurring identity question at this venue is "what is the *principle*?" A SOSP
paper is remembered as an idea with a system attached, not a system with features
attached. Concretely:
Back to top