Individual skill

annual-review-of-astronomy-and-astrophysics

Use when targeting Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ARA&A) or deciding whether a review proposal fits this invited, comprehensive, very-high-impact venue. Encodes the journal's fit, framing, evidence bar, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-NaturalScience-Journal-Skills/skills/annual-review-of-astronomy-and-astrophysics/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (annual-review-of-astronomy-and-astrophysics)

## Journal positioning

The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ARA&A) is published by Annual Reviews, and it is among the highest-impact venues in the astronomical sciences. Its defining character is that it publishes only invited, comprehensive, critical reviews — never primary research. An ARA&A article is the field's authoritative synthesis of a subject: it surveys what is known, weighs the evidence, resolves or sharpens disagreements, and orients the community toward open questions. Authors are typically commissioned by the editorial committee, and a topic earns a review when it is mature enough to synthesize yet active enough to need orientation. Readership is the entire astronomy and astrophysics community, including graduate students who treat these articles as canonical entry points. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** tool. It does not replace the journal's current official guidelines. Before proposing or submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the Annual Reviews site and confirm the invitation/commissioning process.

## When to trigger

- An author has been invited (or is proposing to the editorial committee) to write a comprehensive review for ARA&A and needs to scope and frame it.
- A researcher mistakes ARA&A for a venue that accepts unsolicited primary research and needs the invited-review model clarified before investing effort.
- A topic is mature enough to synthesize authoritatively yet active enough to need a critical orientation, and the author is choosing between ARA&A and Reviews of Modern Physics or a focused review series.
- The author needs ARA&A's comprehensiveness, critical-synthesis, and house-style expectations before drafting.

## Scope & topic fit
Back to top