Menu

Individual skill

jos-author-response

0upvotes

当你收到《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的外审意见、需要撰写修回说明（答复审稿人）并修改稿件时使用。覆盖逐条回应的结构、"必须改/可讨论/礼貌不改"的分级策略、修回说明与稿件修改处的对应标注、补做实验的取舍、多轮修回之间的一致性维护、以及与责任编委和主编终审衔接的中文表达分寸，帮助你把《软件学报》(Journal of Software) 的"修改后再审"稳妥地做成录用，而不是在下一轮被退稿。

Journal-of-Software-Skills/skills/jos-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 《软件学报》审稿意见答复与修回 (Journal of Software Author Response)

收到《软件学报》(Journal of Software, JOS) 的"修改后再审"意见后，修回说明（答复审稿人）的
质量往往决定下一轮是录用还是退稿。本刊大修常由原外审专家复审，敷衍会被识别。本技能给出
逐条回应的结构与分寸（流程背景见 [`jos-review-process`](../jos-review-process/SKILL.md)）。

## 一、修回总原则

- **逐条回应**：对每条意见单独回应，不遗漏、不合并含糊带过。
- **尊重且有据**：感谢审稿人，回应基于证据与论证，不情绪化、不辩护式对抗。
- **真正落实**：能改的就改，并在稿件中标出对应修改；不能改的说明理由。
- **前后一致**：多轮修回时，与上一轮答复、与稿件其他部分不矛盾。

## 二、意见分级策略
Back to top