Menu

Individual skill

the-journal-of-philosophy

0upvotes

Use when targeting The Journal of Philosophy or deciding whether an analytic philosophy manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit as a top generalist venue for agenda-setting articles, the argument-rigor and broad-significance bar, dialectical-engagement expectations, house style and double-blind norms, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

English-Humanities-Journal-Skills/skills/the-journal-of-philosophy/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# The Journal of Philosophy (the-journal-of-philosophy)

## Journal positioning

The Journal of Philosophy, published by the Journal of Philosophy, Inc. (associated with
Columbia University), is a top generalist analytic venue with a long history of publishing
**influential, agenda-setting articles** — papers that name a problem, coin a distinction,
or reframe a debate and that the field then argues about for years. Articles tend to be
relatively concise and high-impact: a single decisive idea, sharply argued, rather than an
exhaustive treatise. Its defining expectation is a rigorous original argument whose
significance is broad enough to matter across analytic philosophy, not only to a sub-area.
A careful but inward-looking paper, or a long survey-style piece without a pointed
contribution, is a poor fit. This skill is a **fit / venue-selection / re-framing** aid. It
does not replace the journal's current submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the
Back to top