Individual skill
socc-author-response
Use when drafting an ACM SoCC author response (rebuttal) during a round's response window, covering the single written turn, answering both the systems and the data/measurement reviewer, supplying the tail-latency and cost numbers reviewers ask for, staying within dual anonymity, and the fact that SoCC has no Major-Revision round to fall back on.
SoCC-Skills/skills/socc-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- No
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- data Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Read excerpt
# SoCC Author Response
Use this after SoCC reviews are released, during the round's **author-response (rebuttal) window**
(SoCC 2026 Round 2: 10-12 Sep 2026). SoCC gives you **one written turn**, not a journal-style
revise-and-resubmit — there is no Major Revision to repair the paper in, so the rebuttal must do all
the persuading before the PC discussion decides. Because the reviewer pool is drawn from **both
SIGMOD and SIGOPS**, a winning rebuttal answers the *systems* reviewer and the *data/measurement*
reviewer, not one at the expense of the other.
## Triage
- Answer what affects the decision: significance of the cloud contribution, soundness of the
mechanism, realism of the deployment or trace, and the measurement quality — especially **tail
latency and cost**, the numbers reviewers most often say are missing.