Individual skill
ssi-author-response
当收到《中国科学:信息科学》(Scientia Sinica Informationis, SSI) 外审意见、需要撰写审稿意见答复信与修回说明时调用。指导如何逐条回应每位审稿人与编委的意见、在修改稿中标注对应位置、以数据与理由而非情绪回应质疑、区分"已修改/已澄清/保留并说明"、处理相互矛盾的意见、控制修回轮次与时限,并保持中文学术礼节。适用于退修(大修/小修)后的 revise-and-resubmit 阶段,与英文姊妹刊 Science China Information Sciences 的修回习惯相通但以本刊中文流程为准。
Scientia-Sinica-Informationis-Skills/skills/ssi-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 7,471 bytes
Read excerpt
# 《中国科学:信息科学》审稿意见答复与修回(Author Response)
收到《中国科学:信息科学》(SCIENTIA SINICA Informationis, SSI) 的退修通知后,
你需要提交两份材料:**修改稿**与**审稿意见答复说明(point-by-point)**。SSI 坚持
公平、公正、客观的审稿原则,编委与外审专家的意见是决定录用的关键;一份条理清晰、
有理有据、态度诚恳的答复,往往与修改本身同等重要。以下流程以本刊中文修回习惯为准,
具体轮次与时限**以退修信与官网当期说明为准(待核实)**。
## 一、动笔前:拆解意见清单
1. 通读**所有**审稿人与编委意见,逐条编号(如 R1-1、R1-2、R2-1、编委-1)。
2. 为每条打标签:**实质性科学质疑 / 实验或证据补充 / 写作与表述 / 格式规范 / 疑似误解**。
3. 标出**相互矛盾**的意见(如一位要求精简、一位要求补充)与**编委的倾向性意见**(权重更高)。
4. 排出修改工作量与时间表,确保在退修时限内完成(时限**待核实**,逾期需提前向编辑部说明)。