Individual skill

iccv-artifact-evaluation

Use when packaging code, models, or data for an ICCV paper at review or release time, covering anonymous in-archive code under the do-not-cite-your-repo rule, the June-to-October release runway after acceptance, weight and license decisions in a field whose landmark releases became infrastructure, and reuse-grade packaging.

ICCV-Skills/skills/iccv-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
No
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# ICCV Artifact Evaluation

ICCV grants no artifact badges; the judgment is social and it is severe, because
the venue's own history sets the bar. ICCV papers like Mask R-CNN (2017), Swin
Transformer (2021), ControlNet (2023), and Segment Anything (2023) are cited as
much for their released artifacts as for their PDFs — at this venue, the release
*is* part of the contribution's afterlife. Package for two moments: the anonymous
review in spring, and the public release whose natural deadline is the October
conference.

## Review-time: the sealed archive

The 2025 rules shape review packaging in two specific ways. First, do not cite or
link your public codebase — anonymity guidance says to write that code "will be
Back to top