Individual skill

ectheory-review-process

Use to understand and prepare for the Econometric Theory (ET) review process — single-anonymous refereeing (reviewers see the author), the Article/Miscellanea/ET-Interview article types, and war-gaming the proof-checking referee before submitting.

Econometric-Theory-Skills/skills/ectheory-review-process/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Review Process (ectheory-review-process)

## When to trigger

- You want to anticipate how ET referees will read a theorem-proof paper before you submit
- Unsure what single-anonymous review means for anonymization and self-citation
- Choosing among ET article types (Article, Miscellanea, and the invited ET Interview)
- War-gaming the objections a careful theory referee will raise

## ET's review model: single-anonymous

ET uses **single-anonymous peer review**: "the author does not know the identity of the reviewers,
but the reviewers know the identity of the author." Practical implications:
Back to top