Individual skill
ndss-experiments
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of an NDSS paper — attack demonstrations, defense evaluations under adaptive adversaries, and Internet measurements — choosing between testbed, emulation, and live experiments and meeting NDSS's deployment-realism evidence bar.
NDSS-Skills/skills/ndss-experiments/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- devops Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,368 bytes
Read excerpt
# NDSS Experiments
Evidence at NDSS answers one question: *would this hold on the real network?* Every design
choice in the evaluation — target selection, vantage, scale, baseline — either supports
that answer or advertises that you avoided it.
## Evidence by contribution type
| You claim... | Reviewers require... | Weak substitute they will flag |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A new attack | End-to-end demonstration on real implementations, named versions, measured preconditions and cost | PoC against a config you weakened |
| A prevalent condition | Defined population, sampling method, validated vulnerability test, false-positive analysis | Extrapolation from anecdotes |
| A defense | Security *and* utility: adaptive-adversary evaluation + overhead on realistic workloads | Blocking only the published attack |
| A detection system | Base-rate honest metrics on traffic resembling deployment, drift discussion | Accuracy on one stale benchmark |