Individual skill
vis-author-response
Use when drafting IEEE VIS author responses across the two-phase review, covering the first-round reviewer discussion, and — distinctively — the conditional-accept second-round revision with its summary-of-changes that maps every required change to a concrete edit and is re-read by the same primary, secondary, and external reviewers under the IEEE TVCG process.
VIS-Skills/skills/vis-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,397
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,530 bytes
Read excerpt
# VIS Author Response
Use this after IEEE VIS reviews are released. VIS has **two distinct speaking turns**, and
conflating them is a common mistake: a first-round engagement with the reviewer discussion, and — if
you receive a **conditional accept** — a full **second-round revision** with a **summary of
changes** accompanying a revised paper that the original reviewers re-read against the required
changes. This is a journal-style revise-and-review, not a one-shot CVPR rebuttal.
## Triage (both turns)
- Answer what affects the decision: novelty, impact, whether the evidence supports the claims,
methodology, encoding/interaction rationale, and reproducibility.
- Use evidence that already exists or that the revision will concretely add — never a vague promise
to "consider" a study.