Individual skill
ase-supplementary
Use when deciding what belongs in the 10-page ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) paper body versus the artifact and supplementary material, splitting content by decision-criticality so nothing that decides acceptance lives outside the reviewed pages under the 10+2 budget.
ASE-Skills/skills/ase-supplementary/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,409
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 3,959 bytes
Read excerpt
# ASE Supplementary
Split content by **decision-criticality**. ASE gives you **10 pages** of body (plus 2 for
references), and reviewers judge the paper on those pages. The artifact and any supplementary
material *support* reproduction and reuse — they do not carry the argument. The failure mode is
exiling a decision-critical result to the artifact and assuming reviewers will dig for it; they
judge what is in the body.
## The decision-criticality rule
- **In the body (must be within 10 pages):** anything a reviewer needs to accept the paper — the
automated task, the technique, the headline results on real subjects, the closest baseline
comparison, the key ablation, and the central threats argument.
- **In the artifact / supplement:** everything needed to *reproduce or reuse* — full configurations,