Individual skill

dac-supplementary

Use when deciding what belongs inside the six reviewed pages of an ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research Manuscript versus in an external repository, given DAC's tight 6+1 budget, its references-only seventh page, the double-blind constraint on any linked material, and the absence of a formal reviewed-appendix or artifact-badging track.

DAC-Skills/skills/dac-supplementary/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# DAC Supplementary Material

Use this to split content between the reviewed pages and anything external. DAC's constraint is
severe and specific: the manuscript is **6 pages of body plus one references-only page**, and unlike
some venues DAC does **not** provide an unlimited reviewed appendix or a formal artifact-evaluation
track (**待核实** per cycle). The governing rule follows directly: **anything that decides
acceptance must fit inside the six body pages**, because a reviewer is neither obligated to nor
guaranteed to open external material.

## The decision-criticality test

For each piece of content, ask: *would a reviewer need this to be convinced the contribution is real
and the QoR claim is fair?* If yes, it belongs in the body. If it merely lets a motivated reader
reproduce or extend the work, it can live externally.
Back to top