Individual skill

imfer-identification

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript — cross-country panel, high-frequency policy-surprise, crisis event study, narrative, or open-economy structural identification. Stress-tests the data-to-object mapping to IMFER's policy-relevant bar; it does not build the model (imfer-theory-model) or run the robustness suite (imfer-robustness).

IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-identification/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Identification Strategy (imfer-identification)

## When to trigger

- A cross-country causal claim rests on OLS-plus-controls or TWFE on staggered policy adoption
- A high-frequency policy-surprise series (monetary, FX intervention) needs its exclusion defended
- A crisis "event study" cannot separate the policy from the macro shock that triggered it
- A capital-control or program effect is plausibly **endogenous to the crisis** it is meant to address
- An open-economy model's parameters are estimated but it is unclear *what in the data* identifies them

## The IMFER identification bar

IMFER referees read as both frontier econometricians and policy analysts, so the **mapping from data to the policy-relevant object** must be explicit *and* the object must be the one a policymaker cares about. International-macro data make this harder than a clean single-country RCT: small N of countries, endogenous policy adoption, global common shocks, and spillovers that violate SUTVA across borders. Name the variation, defend it against the macro confounder, and report inference that respects cross-country dependence.
Back to top