Individual skill
artbull-review-process
Use to understand how The Art Bulletin evaluates a submission — double-blind peer review, what referees and the editor look for in art-historical work, and the likely decision outcomes. Helps anticipate review; it does not contact editors or simulate a specific referee.
The-Art-Bulletin-Skills/skills/artbull-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- engineering Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,092 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (artbull-review-process)
The Art Bulletin uses **double-blind peer review**: both author and reviewers are anonymous, which is
why submissions must be **Microsoft Word (not PDF)** with all author-identifying information stripped
from text and notes. Knowing what referees weigh helps you pre-empt the objections that sink papers.
## When to trigger
- Before submitting, to pressure-test the paper against likely referee objections
- Understanding why anonymity (Word, no self-revealing citations) matters procedurally
- Interpreting a decision letter and planning next steps
- Deciding whether the contribution is strong enough for the discipline's flagship
## How the journal evaluates