Individual skill
icra-author-response
Use when responding to ICRA reviews in the channels that actually exist — turning decision-day reviewer comments into a disciplined camera-ready revision, writing the revise-and-resubmit response letter on the RA-L pathway, or converting an ICRA reject into a targeted IROS or RA-L resubmission — since classic ICRA offers no rebuttal.
ICRA-Skills/skills/icra-author-response/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- writing Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 6,300 bytes
Read excerpt
# ICRA Author Response
At most conferences "author response" means a rebuttal window. Classic ICRA has
none (verify the current cycle — see `icra-review-process`): reviews arrive
together with the January decision. Author response at ICRA therefore happens in
three real channels, each with its own craft: the **camera-ready revision** after
acceptance, the **RA-L response letter** if the work travels the journal
pathway, and the **resubmission memo** after a reject. Doing these well is a
skill; pretending a rebuttal exists is a planning error.
## Channel 1: the camera-ready revision (accepted papers)
Reviewer comments on an accepted ICRA paper are advisory — no one re-checks
compliance — but ignoring them is shortsighted: reviewers are your first