Individual skill

jim-contribution-framing

Use when articulating what a Journal of International Marketing (JIM) manuscript contributes — converting results into theory advances for international marketing and decisions for border-crossing managers, and defending against the "context extension" verdict. It frames the payoff; jim-writing-style polishes the prose.

Journal-of-International-Marketing-Skills/skills/jim-contribution-framing/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,397
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Contribution Framing (jim-contribution-framing)

## When to trigger

- The findings are solid but the contribution paragraphs read as a results summary
- Someone on the team describes the paper as "X, but international"
- The implications section advises managers to "consider cultural differences"
- An Insight-format submission (<4,000 words) must justify itself on one finding

## JIM's double gate

A JIM contribution has to clear two bars at once, and the first is the journal's signature:

1. **Theory bar: the international dimension must have *changed* the theory.** After your study, what do we now understand about the mechanism that a purely domestic research program could never have revealed? Acceptable shapes: a boundary condition that redraws where a "universal" mechanism holds; a reconciliation of conflicting country-specific findings via a theorized moderator; a construct or mechanism that only exists across borders (globalness perceptions, psychic distance, export capabilities). If the honest answer is "the theory survived intact in more countries," you have a robustness note, not a JIM contribution — return to `jim-theory-development`.
Back to top