Menu

Individual skill

amann-editor-strategy

0upvotes

Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or draft the response letter (amann-revision).

Academy-of-Management-Annals-Skills/skills/amann-editor-strategy/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,404
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# Editor & Referee Strategy for a Review (amann-editor-strategy)

## When to trigger

- A proposal was invited and you are aligning the full review's scope with the editor
- You want to anticipate what Annals referees of a *review* push on (different from a paper)
- The editor has asked you to expand, cut, sharpen the framework, or rebalance coverage
- You are calibrating revision depth and the twice-yearly cadence

## The editor relationship at Annals is unusually direct

Annals' process makes the editor your central partner — more than at most journals. The proposal is reviewed double-blind by the Associate Editors, but once invited, the **full review forgoes double-blind and is developed primarily with the Associate Editor and Editor** (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). You are effectively co-developing the review with an expert editor who already endorsed the idea. Use that:

- **The proposal *is* the scope contract.** The four headings you committed to (Focus / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights) define what was invited. Departing from them silently is the fastest way to lose editor confidence — renegotiate explicitly if the literature pushes you elsewhere.
Back to top