Individual skill

sports-and-science

Use when targeting 《体育与科学》(Sports & Science, Jiangsu) — a CSSCI sport-science journal distinctive for reflective, interdisciplinary, theory-forward and methodologically self-aware scholarship (academic dialogues, critical essays, problem-and-method debates) in sport humanities & social science. Best for conceptual/critical contributions that advance how the field thinks; route empirical exercise science, applied competitive work, and standard survey社科 to the appropriate specialist venues.

Chinese-Sport-Science-Journal-Skills/skills/sports-and-science/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# 《体育与科学》投稿(sports-and-science)

## 期刊定位

江苏省体育科学研究所主办的 CSSCI 体育学刊物,以**思辨性、跨学科、理论批判与方法论反思**著称,常刊学术对话 / 深度访谈、问题与方法的论辩、概念与理论的批判性文章。核心要求是**原创的理论 / 方法论贡献 + 思想density + 论证力**:它推动"学科怎么想问题",而非又一篇标准实证或对策报告。常规问卷实证、应用训练稿在此偏弱。

## 触发时机

- 题目是体育学的概念 / 理论 / 方法论问题,或对某研究范式 / 议题的批判性反思
- 文章形态偏理论论辩、学术对话、跨学科思想性写作
- 有原创概念框架或方法论主张,想与学界对话
- 不确定该投思辨理论向(本刊)还是规范实证社科向(《体育学研究》/《上海体育大学学报》)

## 选题偏好
Back to top