Menu

Individual skill

jfi-rebuttal

0upvotes

Use when planning an R&R response letter for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) — single-blind review where referees know you, often a small number of expert reports, a narrow appeal path, and pushback centered on the intermediation channel. It structures the response; it does not fabricate results.

Journal-of-Financial-Intermediation-Skills/skills/jfi-rebuttal/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,409
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# R&R Rebuttal Strategy (jfi-rebuttal)

## When to trigger

- You received an R&R or a reject-with-encouragement and must reply to referees and the Managing Editor
- War-gaming likely objections before submitting (pre-mortem)

## JFI-specific posture (verified 2026-06-20; re-confirm on the official page)

- Review is **single-anonymized (single-blind)** — referees know who you are, so tone matters and
  gratuitous self-defense reads poorly.
- A paper may rest on a **minimum of one expert reviewer**, so a single decisive report can shape the
  outcome; treat each point as potentially pivotal.
- A formal appeal may be possible under Elsevier's appeal policy, but only one appeal per submission is
Back to top