Menu

Individual skill

wsdm-artifact-evaluation

0upvotes

Use when packaging code, data, and models as evidence for a WSDM paper - anonymous repositories cited in the PDF, the proprietary-log dilemma of web-scale research, public-benchmark substitution tiers, WSDM Cup datasets, and what credible artifact release looks like at a venue without a formal badge process.

WSDM-Skills/skills/wsdm-artifact-evaluation/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
No
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Not checked yet
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,411
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# WSDM Artifact Evaluation

Package artifacts for a venue where they are persuasion, not process. The pack
found no formal artifact-evaluation track or badge system for current WSDM
editions (待核实 each cycle) - the CFP-level expectation is the community norm of
"practical yet principled": reviewers reward submissions whose claims a skeptic
could re-derive. That means the artifact's job is to be *inspectable during
review* and *usable after publication*, with no committee to certify it.

## The reviewer-facing artifact

Because appendices count against WSDM's page budget and there is no rebuttal in
which to hand over materials later, the anonymous repository referenced in the
PDF is the only expansion space you get. Build it to be skimmed in ten minutes:
Back to top