Menu

Individual skill

percom-author-response

0upvotes

Use when drafting an IEEE PerCom rebuttal after being invited following the initial reviews, covering the bounded single-round reply that answers explicit reviewer questions, corrects misreadings, points to evidence already in the paper without promising new experiments, and preserves double-blindness.

PerCom-Skills/skills/percom-author-response/SKILL.md

Read pinned source

Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498

What was checked

Matches the observed repository HEAD
Yes
Scanner rules are current
Yes
Repository scan complete
No
Skill scan complete
Yes
Observed behavior
Network or broad shell
Last checked
Nov 9, 2026

These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.

Install this skill

Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.

An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.

Repository context

Repository stars (not skill ratings)
1,405
Repository last updated
Sep 27, 2026
License
MIT

Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.

Files and excerpt

File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.

Browse files
Read excerpt

# PerCom Author Response

Use this after PerCom reviews are released **and you have been invited to submit a rebuttal**.
PerCom's rebuttal is a **single, bounded turn**: it answers the reviewers' explicit questions,
resolves misunderstandings, and clarifies — and the call states that **new experiments are not
expected**. There is no journal-style revision that follows, so the rebuttal must win with the
paper you already submitted. It remains **double-blind**: reveal no author, institution, testbed,
or dataset-owner identity.

## First: did you clear the early-rejection gate?

Papers with no positive review are **early-rejected** before the rebuttal opens — there is no
rebuttal to write for those. If you were invited, at least one reviewer sees a path to publication:
your job is to give that advocate the answers they need for the TPC discussion, and to neutralize
Back to top