Individual skill
hri-review-process
Use to understand and navigate the ACM/IEEE HRI full-paper review pipeline — the initial desk check and track assignment, the 1AC/2AC plus three external reviewers, the double-blind two-phase model, the author rebuttal, the online reviewer discussion, the program-committee meeting, and the per-track subcommittees — and to see where author leverage exists.
HRI-Skills/skills/hri-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,404
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,722 bytes
Read excerpt
# HRI Review Process
Understanding HRI's pipeline tells you where your effort actually moves the outcome. HRI runs a
**double-blind, two-phase** review with a real **rebuttal** and a **program-committee meeting** —
closer to a rigorous conference model than to a journal R&R, but with a discussion culture that
gives the rebuttal genuine weight. Contribution-typed **subcommittees** mean your paper is judged by
reviewers matched to its track. This skill models the pipeline; `hri-author-response` covers writing
the rebuttal. Mechanics below are the HRI 2026 cycle (see `resources/official-source-map.md`).
## The pipeline, stage by stage
1. **Initial check (desk stage).** Program-Committee Chairs, Track Chairs, and Area Chairs screen
submissions for **desk rejections** (over length, anonymity violations, out of scope) and
**track changes** (moving a paper to a better-fitting subcommittee). Clearing this stage is