Individual skill
newms-review-process
Use when anticipating how a New Media & Society (NM&S) manuscript will be judged — anonymous (double-anonymized) peer review, what interdisciplinary referees weigh, and the decision categories. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the response letter.
New-Media-and-Society-Skills/skills/newms-review-process/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,400
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- operations Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,553 bytes
Read excerpt
# Review Process (newms-review-process)
NM&S runs a **strictly anonymous** peer review: the reviewer's name is withheld from the author and the
author's name from the reviewer (a double-anonymized model). Understanding what an **interdisciplinary**
panel weighs — and how high the bar is, given the journal's very large submission volume — helps you
preempt the objections before they become a decision.
## When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test the paper against likely referee objections
- After a decision, to read the letter and decide whether to revise (then go to `newms-rebuttal`)
- Estimating odds and effort given NM&S's selectivity
## How NM&S review works