Individual skill
ieeesp-reproducibility
Use when hardening the reproducibility of an IEEE S&P (Oakland) paper's evidence before submission, including environment pinning for exploits and side channels, seed and trial reporting for probabilistic attacks, measurement snapshotting of live systems, and honest availability statements under ethical release limits.
IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,412
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,771 bytes
Read excerpt
# IEEE S&P Reproducibility
Use this while the evidence is being produced — months before
`ieeesp-artifact-evaluation` packages it. Security results decay in ways ML
results do not: targets get patched, infrastructure changes, and an attack
that "worked in March" can be unreproducible by review time. Reproducibility
at S&P is first about **freezing the world you measured**.
## Freeze the target, not just the code
| Evidence type | What must be pinned | Decay risk if not |
|---|---|---|
| Software exploit | Target version, build flags, distro, patch level | Silent fix ships mid-review |
| Microarchitectural attack | CPU model + stepping, microcode, OS mitigations state | Microcode update changes timing |