Individual skill
ijoc-literature-positioning
Use when staking the computational/methodological contribution of an INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC) manuscript against OR/MS and CS prior art. Positions the advance relative to the right baselines and the right frontier; it does not invent citations.
INFORMS-Journal-on-Computing-Skills/skills/ijoc-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- No
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Not checked yet
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,411
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 5,670 bytes
Read excerpt
# Literature Positioning (ijoc-literature-positioning)
## When to trigger
- Reviewers say "the contribution over existing methods is unclear" or "this is incremental"
- Your related-work section cites application papers but not the **algorithmic/computational** prior art you actually compete with
- You straddle OR and CS literatures and are unsure which frontier you are advancing
- A referee names a recent method you did not compare against, and you must decide whether it is the relevant baseline
## Positioning IJOC papers — two frontiers, one claim
An IJOC paper usually advances against **two literatures at once**: the OR/MS literature that owns the *problem* and the computing literature that owns the *method*. Your positioning must make clear which frontier you push and by how much, in computational terms. The decisive move is to identify the **state-of-the-art method you must beat or match**, cite it precisely, and commit to it as an experimental baseline. Vague positioning ("little work exists") reads as not having read the field and is a fast path to desk rejection by an Area Editor who knows it well.
| Your claim type | The prior art you must engage | The baseline this implies |