Individual skill
arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility
Use when documenting the literature search and making any embedded meta-analysis reproducible for an Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) review. Covers search transparency, meta-analytic rigor, and open materials; it does not run the narrative search (arpsych-literature-synthesis) or design exhibits (arpsych-tables-figures).
Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility/SKILL.md
Source commit 932eb23331721b16e967c59f093781be1928b498
What was checked
- Matches the observed repository HEAD
- Yes
- Scanner rules are current
- Yes
- Repository scan complete
- No
- Skill scan complete
- Yes
- Observed behavior
- Network or broad shell
- Last checked
- Nov 9, 2026
These are observations at the recorded commit, not a guarantee of safety. Review the source before running it.
Install this skill
Choose an agent in your Stack or copy a command below. Commands fetch the pinned commit and copy only this skill directory. Existing destinations are refused. Copying a command does not install anything.
An install command is unavailable: current rules, complete repository and skill scans, an eligible behavior level and a permitted license are required.
Repository context
- Repository stars (not skill ratings)
- 1,405
- Repository last updated
- Sep 27, 2026
- License
- MIT
Observed agent integration: No specific integration evidence. Standard SKILL.md installation does not imply verified compatibility.
- academic-writing Repository topic
- agent-skills Repository topic
- journal Repository topic
- academic-research Repository topic
- ai-agents Repository topic
- anthropic Repository topic
- awesome-list Repository topic
- claude Repository topic
- claude-code Repository topic
- economics Repository topic
- design Derived category
- research Derived category
Files and excerpt
File metadata and permitted, redacted excerpts come from the recorded scan. Source links are pinned to that commit.
Browse files
SKILL.mdcore · 4,756 bytes
Read excerpt
# Transparency & Reproducibility (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility)
## When to trigger
- The review documents a systematic search and you must report it reproducibly
- The review embeds a **meta-analysis** or any new quantitative synthesis
- You are deciding what to deposit (search log, coding sheet, effect-size data, code)
- A reader or the Committee should be able to verify how the literature was selected
## A review reports no new data — so transparency bites elsewhere
A pure narrative review has no dataset of its own, so the transparency obligation does **not** look like a primary-paper replication package. It bites on two things:
1. **How the literature was found and selected** — the search protocol from `arpsych-literature-synthesis`, written up so a reader could reproduce the coverage.